While I'm here, I'd like to clear something up. It's about this graphic from The Seventeen Magazine Project, describing when pigtails are "infantilizing" (i.e., undermining the expression of adult personhood) on a grown woman. Jamie Keiles draws the distinction between infantilizing and appropriate as one of age: people out of their teens who wear pigtails are infantilized by it. But this is wrong.
The dividing line, as you can see from her graphic, is not one of age, but of positioning on the head. Pigtails worn below the ear are appropriate for women, while pigtails worn at or above the ear are appropriate for children. This is not arbitrary: the whole purpose of the child's hairstyle is to prevent her from gaining easy access to her hair for the purpose of chewing it or putting mud or lye in there. Being granted full access to one's own hair is a sign of maturity and good judgement, and that is what pigtails worn below the ear represent.
Braids are this whole other thing that I don't feel too qualified to summarize, as I would have to touch on The Shining, native appropriations, medieval chic, Dorothy Gale, Pippi Longstocking, Helga, and vikings. I should mention that very long hair that would be appropriate for braiding is worn mainly by older children, teens, women in their twenties, and hippie witches.
Local woman finishes last summer dress of 2024
2 months ago
No comments:
Post a Comment